If anyone had any doubt about the respect Congress has for the military, the almost two-minute-long thundering standing ovation received by wounded Army Sgt. 1st Class Cory Remsburg during President Barack Obama’s State of the Union address should be all the evidence needed.
Americans by and large are justly proud of the men and women who serve our nation around the world. But lurking under the surface is the chilling report earlier this year by the Sexual Assault Prevention and Response Office (SAPRO) of the Department of Defense.
It revealed that an estimated 26,000 cases of unwanted sexual contact and sexual assaults occurred in the U.S. military in 2012, a 37 percent increase from the previous year.
Another Defense Department report said one in five female service members reported experiencing unwanted sexual contact.
Those numbers are astoundingly troubling. According to the SAPRO report, 25 percent of women and 27 percent of men who were subjected to the unwanted sexual contact said the offender was someone in their military chain of command.
Not surprising given that horrid statistic, 50 percent of female victims said they didn’t report the incidents because they didn’t believe anything would be done.
Commandant of the Marine Corps Gen. James Amos said this year that victims “don’t trust the chain of command.”
The idea that our sons and daughters enlist to serve their country only to be the victims of sexual predators is outrageous. It is even more outrageous that efforts by a bipartisan group of senators to change the way our military handles sexual assault complaints are likely to fail in a vote this week.
Liberal New York Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand and conservative Texas Sen. Ted Cruz are on the same side. In fact, 53 senators support Gillibrand’s proposal to remove the military chain of command’s power to decide whether to try sexual assault cases.