The Daily Star, Oneonta, NY - otsego county news, delaware county news, oneonta news, oneonta sports

Breaking News

Opinion

March 28, 2013

Paul, GOP need to find clear policy

The spat last week between The Associated Press and Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., over the meaning of Paul’s words about immigration reform serves as an example of how complex issues can be reduced to petty squabbles about semantics.

The disagreement arose after Paul’s staff sent a copy Monday of the senator’s speech planned for Tuesday before the U.S. Hispanic Chamber of Commerce, hoping to build buzz ahead of the event. But unfortunately for Paul, the text of the speech contained a small political bombshell: the suggestion that immigrants who came to the United States illegally should be able to earn citizenship.

But after conservative pundits mocked his plan as “Randmesty,” Paul deviated from his prepared remarks at the last minute. Instead of using terms such as “amnesty” and “pathway to citizenship,” Paul talked around the issue, admitting “we aren’t going to deport” the roughly 11 million illegal immigrants already here, and hinting that “prudence” necessitates “bringing these workers out of the shadows and into becoming taxpaying members of society.”

It may look like a duck and quack like a duck, but Paul insists his plan isn’t amnesty. Paul could have quickly ended the issue by releasing a simple statement saying whether illegal immigrants should be eligible for citizenship. But that would deny Paul a chance to deploy his cherished media-bashing schtick, so instead he cast doubt on AP reporter Erica Werner’s professionalism.

By doing so, Paul shifted attention away from his untenable, fence-straddling stance on immigration — and gave his reform plan a veneer of deniability.

The AP, to its credit, stood by its original story, only adding that there were discrepancies between Paul’s speech and the text his staff forwarded to reporters a day earlier. One hour later, Paul seemed to concede the issue altogether, telling the AP: “The whole debate on immigration is trapped in a couple of words: ‘pathway to citizenship’ and ‘amnesty.’ If we get trapped in these terms, either for or against, we’re going to get polarized.”

Text Only
Opinion

Additional Content
Join the Debate
Helium
Additional Resources
CNHI News Service
Poll

Do you plan to attend the Baseball Hall of Fame Induction?

Yes
No
Not sure
     View Results